I just finished reading your article in New View and was moved to look you up on Substack. I'd read The Invisible Rainbow a few years ago and have had an interest in this subject for some time. One thing I've come across which maybe isn't what one would initially suspect, is that 5G can operate in any of three different frequency bands: Low band (600-900 Mhz), medium band (2.5-3.5 Ghz) and high band, aka millimeter wave (24 Ghz and above). I suspect the physiological effects would be quite different depending on which band of 5G one is dealing with. Is the variation in effect depending on the frequency band in use anything you have looked into in the course of your research? I'm wondering if you have any suggestions as to what a person could do to counteract the effects of 5G and other emf exposures on their personal health? One heard a fair bit about 5G and it's supposed health effects earlier in the pandemic, but in the post-pandemic analysis, most of the Covid contrarians, or at least the ones that I read, seem more focused on the vax factor. So, very much in the spirit of John the Baptist (as we are in his season of the liturgical year) you seem to be something like a voice crying out in the wilderness with this line of research. Thank you for researching and sharing these unpopular truths. Something else I'd like to draw your attention to, on quite the other end of the spectrum, is Benn Jordan's research on the subsonic vibrations, seemingly emanating from large data centres and their deleterious effects on human health. Here's a video in which he shares some of his research on that topic: https://www.bitchute.com/video/y5jTMm5ZDiHi
We don't have a lot of data concerning different frequencies because (at least at the time we were doing our searches) only a percentage of announcements about rollouts included frequency information. Based on such data as was available it does not seem clear cut that one frequency is worse than another. I think most people began with a kind of assumption that millimeter wave would be the deadly one, but that doesn't necessarily seem to have been the case. There are many cases where lower frequency installations coincided with big peaks of excess death, and also instances of millimeter wave installations that didn't. What did seem to be a meaningful correlation was physical antennas from a certain famous Chinese manufacturer. Installations using those antennas seemed to be very frequently among the higher peaks, while installations including those using millimeter wave, but with other antennas, frequently featured among the 'exceptions, or lower instances of mortality.
Regarding 'John the Baptist', well, yeah, one can't expect the whole world to be coming in and saying wow, this must be true, great job! But I always hold to the maxim that says the three responses to genuinely new perspectives, coming in sequence over time, are 'Don't be ridiculous', 'Maybe' and 'That's what I've been saying all along'.
Thanks also for the link re sonic effects (and other ills) of data centres. Good to know there are others like Ben Jordan out there digging into the issues. And others like yourself asking questions and listening to emerging information.
Michael, the work represented here is staggering. I had no idea you've been doing this level of meticulous, methodical research on the topic. What a tremendous service to humanity!
And a thankless one, too, since the moneyed interests are surely aligned to ensure your efforts go unnoticed. I will do my part to spread this report far and wide.
Thank you for caring so much about Health and Truth, perhaps the two most sadly abused aspirations of our time. Xox
It's curious how one measures the response to a Substack post. The response to this one has been quite muted, at least in terms of likes and comments. But I can see on the dashboard that many people have opened it 14, 26, 28 even 40 times, and many, many 4 or 5 or 6 times. So people are looking at it, even if not moved to comment.
It was indeed a monumental amount of work and I confess to a certain disappoointment in not having more impact, at least visibly. But to see the impact it had on you, and your commitment to spreading it further, that one response alone is enough to make it worthwhile. God bless you.
Regarding truth: American comedian Leonarda Joni said in an interview recently that the real measure of a person's goodness is their willingness to die for the truth. Here's to that!!
Many thanks for taking the time to comment, and I wish you strength in what I know are still difficult times for you.
I believe there are multiple reasons why your piece has not received the attention it deserves, Michael. And I'd be happy to share those with you offline, if that's at all useful. Let me know! (Wow, a comedian said that?? Now I know the world is COMPLETELY upside down... 😂)
Mary, you know how I value your insights on the world. (If you don't, you should!)
I'd love to hear your thoughts. If you have some time over the weekend just let me know when. Otherwise int the week is fine too. (Zoom, or gonna send me an email?)
That's a lot of article, well articulated no doubt but I confess I haven't read the lot. As is the way of things in reality there's always a twist. The so called solution of r.n.a. interference itself makes me wonder. Can it really be as simple as a bugfix? My feeling is that by r.n.a. interference we are in ourselves digging another hole. Conventional science suggests we are simply vaccinating, but what if by blocking certain messenger protocols the jab has in fact turned off nature's Radio One. Zombie nation. It's always useful in medicine to define a drug by it's side effects. Reporting from the mental health ward. ./out
Agree that the 'bug fix' mentality is a problem, and that mRNA products are likely digging another hole. There is no shortage of evidence for that. It seems very probable that this was a contributor to the excess deaths from around the spring of 2021 onwards. Yet excess deaths had everywhere been evevated for over a year before that happened, and almost always in sync with roll out of 5G technologies. Even after the mRNA shots began, excess deaths continued to show peaks in sync with further 5G rollouts.
I just finished reading your article in New View and was moved to look you up on Substack. I'd read The Invisible Rainbow a few years ago and have had an interest in this subject for some time. One thing I've come across which maybe isn't what one would initially suspect, is that 5G can operate in any of three different frequency bands: Low band (600-900 Mhz), medium band (2.5-3.5 Ghz) and high band, aka millimeter wave (24 Ghz and above). I suspect the physiological effects would be quite different depending on which band of 5G one is dealing with. Is the variation in effect depending on the frequency band in use anything you have looked into in the course of your research? I'm wondering if you have any suggestions as to what a person could do to counteract the effects of 5G and other emf exposures on their personal health? One heard a fair bit about 5G and it's supposed health effects earlier in the pandemic, but in the post-pandemic analysis, most of the Covid contrarians, or at least the ones that I read, seem more focused on the vax factor. So, very much in the spirit of John the Baptist (as we are in his season of the liturgical year) you seem to be something like a voice crying out in the wilderness with this line of research. Thank you for researching and sharing these unpopular truths. Something else I'd like to draw your attention to, on quite the other end of the spectrum, is Benn Jordan's research on the subsonic vibrations, seemingly emanating from large data centres and their deleterious effects on human health. Here's a video in which he shares some of his research on that topic: https://www.bitchute.com/video/y5jTMm5ZDiHi
Many thanks for this Richard.
We don't have a lot of data concerning different frequencies because (at least at the time we were doing our searches) only a percentage of announcements about rollouts included frequency information. Based on such data as was available it does not seem clear cut that one frequency is worse than another. I think most people began with a kind of assumption that millimeter wave would be the deadly one, but that doesn't necessarily seem to have been the case. There are many cases where lower frequency installations coincided with big peaks of excess death, and also instances of millimeter wave installations that didn't. What did seem to be a meaningful correlation was physical antennas from a certain famous Chinese manufacturer. Installations using those antennas seemed to be very frequently among the higher peaks, while installations including those using millimeter wave, but with other antennas, frequently featured among the 'exceptions, or lower instances of mortality.
Regarding 'John the Baptist', well, yeah, one can't expect the whole world to be coming in and saying wow, this must be true, great job! But I always hold to the maxim that says the three responses to genuinely new perspectives, coming in sequence over time, are 'Don't be ridiculous', 'Maybe' and 'That's what I've been saying all along'.
Thanks also for the link re sonic effects (and other ills) of data centres. Good to know there are others like Ben Jordan out there digging into the issues. And others like yourself asking questions and listening to emerging information.
Michael, the work represented here is staggering. I had no idea you've been doing this level of meticulous, methodical research on the topic. What a tremendous service to humanity!
And a thankless one, too, since the moneyed interests are surely aligned to ensure your efforts go unnoticed. I will do my part to spread this report far and wide.
Thank you for caring so much about Health and Truth, perhaps the two most sadly abused aspirations of our time. Xox
Mary, Mary....
It's curious how one measures the response to a Substack post. The response to this one has been quite muted, at least in terms of likes and comments. But I can see on the dashboard that many people have opened it 14, 26, 28 even 40 times, and many, many 4 or 5 or 6 times. So people are looking at it, even if not moved to comment.
It was indeed a monumental amount of work and I confess to a certain disappoointment in not having more impact, at least visibly. But to see the impact it had on you, and your commitment to spreading it further, that one response alone is enough to make it worthwhile. God bless you.
Regarding truth: American comedian Leonarda Joni said in an interview recently that the real measure of a person's goodness is their willingness to die for the truth. Here's to that!!
Many thanks for taking the time to comment, and I wish you strength in what I know are still difficult times for you.
XOX.
I believe there are multiple reasons why your piece has not received the attention it deserves, Michael. And I'd be happy to share those with you offline, if that's at all useful. Let me know! (Wow, a comedian said that?? Now I know the world is COMPLETELY upside down... 😂)
Mary, you know how I value your insights on the world. (If you don't, you should!)
I'd love to hear your thoughts. If you have some time over the weekend just let me know when. Otherwise int the week is fine too. (Zoom, or gonna send me an email?)
xox
That's a lot of article, well articulated no doubt but I confess I haven't read the lot. As is the way of things in reality there's always a twist. The so called solution of r.n.a. interference itself makes me wonder. Can it really be as simple as a bugfix? My feeling is that by r.n.a. interference we are in ourselves digging another hole. Conventional science suggests we are simply vaccinating, but what if by blocking certain messenger protocols the jab has in fact turned off nature's Radio One. Zombie nation. It's always useful in medicine to define a drug by it's side effects. Reporting from the mental health ward. ./out
Hi CE, thanks for your comment.
Agree that the 'bug fix' mentality is a problem, and that mRNA products are likely digging another hole. There is no shortage of evidence for that. It seems very probable that this was a contributor to the excess deaths from around the spring of 2021 onwards. Yet excess deaths had everywhere been evevated for over a year before that happened, and almost always in sync with roll out of 5G technologies. Even after the mRNA shots began, excess deaths continued to show peaks in sync with further 5G rollouts.