Thank you, great to have a summary of so much that is going on especially the good stuff. I have a sense that even if we get up to a only about one third of people who are aware it would be sufficient for us to move forward in a positive way. Maybe even fewer. Thanks
Absolutely. I think even 10% would completely turn it. At that point the numbers would start to rise faster. Even though we are far from 10%, I think the number awakening in the past couple of years is unprecendented, and sill rising. Let's keep working on it! Thanks for the feedback!
[23/9 11:29] Elisabeth: Your latest substack is brilliant and so rich. Thank you so much for all this information
May I add that Jacque Dogna use Serracor to take off the secondary effects of spike protein and graphene oxide or nattikinase derived from the Japonese natto
The elephant pictures are absolutely wonderful, really like jewels.
Thanks for this additional info about combating spike protein probs! Glad you found the piece useful and enjoyed the 'jewel-like' elephants - I enjoyed 'curating' them!
A very useful synopsis. I particularly like the final elephant image, so very on track and out of the womb, with the rider focused on the tiger and snake in battle over the antelope. Always good to remember that such predators can only act in unison for just so long before the compact collapses into blind greed. As pointed out with Macron's distancing from the club, compounded by the attack in his derriere of francophone Africa.
So true Yvette - the limits to which essentially destructive and egoistic powers will be able to sustain their collaboration is a significant source of hope - along with others going all the way up to 'higher powers' (from which point of view I also I also liked the noble elephant rider with the shining spiritual aura!). And you are also right to point out that Macron is besieged not only by the yellow jackets at home, but by the hypocrisies come home to roost from Niger. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
comment recieved by email from Michael Wood, reposted here with permission:
"Michael,
This is excellent.
How on earth do we motivate people to vote for a new party that would change things? We are stuck in a rut and I don't see Reform as being able to step up to the plate.
Incidentally, I recently had an appointment with my GP surgery. I was greeted by Dr. Robert Laurenson the BMA co chairman who went on holiday instead of manning a picket line. He now is working at our local surgery. I suppose it sums up the problem we have with a self appointed elite who feel they are above the 'common' folk. Did feudalism ever end?
Many thanks for the feedback Michael. I have long been meaning to respond to your last message about having no real voting choices. It's been a bit of a struggle to keep up correspendence, but now's the chance:
I do not find myself at all surprised to find that there are no real voting choices. For me part of the message of our times is that the systems and concepts of government we have had for a long time are no longer adequate. The more we are confronted with systemic failure, the more we are obliged to start moving toward different systems. In particular, it no longer makes sense to expect 'government' to be responsible for everything. We should be moving toward a day when government is responsible for defining and policing a frameworks of rights which empower other institutions to keep the commodities and the economy moving and others yet to operate cultural activities like education, science, medicine and the arts – both with no direct interference from government. (Other side being, no interference in government by corporations either).
Think of it as three mutually regulating 'governments' – one of the 'rights state', one of commerce, and one of culture (which encompasses everything else, and is particpated in by everybody else – or at least everybody who wants to). Except that each works differnently, and they are organised so as to be mutually regulating. 'Cultural' becomes a much wider category, including even things like banking and the operation of courts. Its institutions form freely and pluralistically and must be as free from government interference as possible. In a sense all of it is in service of 'culture' – because, surely, a flourishing culture is the goal? And because culture can only arise from the people. Despite ridiculous titles like 'minister of culture' it cannot be brought into being by government. But in another sense, it is still 'the state' that leads – the state remains the elected body and is the 'conductor of the orchestra', defining the rights framework that empowers all the rest. With it's remit thus reduced however, a) it might actually have a chance of succeeding, and b) people might stand a chance of understanding what they are voting for.
The political fight on 'existing terms' clearly has to go on, because for now that is the system we are in. But there we are back to square one – no meaningful options. Even if people are elected who might change things, they are generally prevented from doing so. Liz Truss was quickly removed, and a man installed who was not voted for even within the party. Such things reach right back to JFK – though we've at least made enough progress that nobody believes the 'lone madman' (Oswald) story any more. There is no authentic journalism - except in small pockets that the mainstream media calls 'fake news'. And as you say, the banks (and the ESG movement) are becoming Inquisitors.
For all these reasons we may be heading for dark times. What I am describing may seem an incredible reach. And it raises a lot of difficult questions about detail and practicality – which I'll work toward in future posts, as well as a forthcoming book. Certainly it can only be taken as a guiding principle for long incremental action. But what else are we to do? The old world does not work anymore.
Thank you, thank you, thank you Michael, for holding up the FULL reality of WHAT IS, not just the half that scares the daylights out of everyone and sends them reaching for distraction of any sort, just to normalize their blood pressure again. This kind of writing is exactly what we need: measured, honest, well-researched, clear. I feel informed reading it, but also empowered, which is exactly what I needed today. There are forces for good throughout, and it makes my heart sing to know more about them all. So well done, friend. Thank you. xox
uufff - it was so much work writing it. So glad it had that effect... everybody wants to spread awareness of what is going on, and then it becomes a littany of horrors. Important to try to balance that!
Thank you, great to have a summary of so much that is going on especially the good stuff. I have a sense that even if we get up to a only about one third of people who are aware it would be sufficient for us to move forward in a positive way. Maybe even fewer. Thanks
Absolutely. I think even 10% would completely turn it. At that point the numbers would start to rise faster. Even though we are far from 10%, I think the number awakening in the past couple of years is unprecendented, and sill rising. Let's keep working on it! Thanks for the feedback!
[23/9 11:29] Elisabeth: Your latest substack is brilliant and so rich. Thank you so much for all this information
May I add that Jacque Dogna use Serracor to take off the secondary effects of spike protein and graphene oxide or nattikinase derived from the Japonese natto
The elephant pictures are absolutely wonderful, really like jewels.
Thanks for this additional info about combating spike protein probs! Glad you found the piece useful and enjoyed the 'jewel-like' elephants - I enjoyed 'curating' them!
God bless.
Wow, this truly gives hope. Thank you
So glad to hear that Cindi. Many thanks for the feedback.
A very useful synopsis. I particularly like the final elephant image, so very on track and out of the womb, with the rider focused on the tiger and snake in battle over the antelope. Always good to remember that such predators can only act in unison for just so long before the compact collapses into blind greed. As pointed out with Macron's distancing from the club, compounded by the attack in his derriere of francophone Africa.
So true Yvette - the limits to which essentially destructive and egoistic powers will be able to sustain their collaboration is a significant source of hope - along with others going all the way up to 'higher powers' (from which point of view I also I also liked the noble elephant rider with the shining spiritual aura!). And you are also right to point out that Macron is besieged not only by the yellow jackets at home, but by the hypocrisies come home to roost from Niger. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
comment recieved by email from Michael Wood, reposted here with permission:
"Michael,
This is excellent.
How on earth do we motivate people to vote for a new party that would change things? We are stuck in a rut and I don't see Reform as being able to step up to the plate.
Incidentally, I recently had an appointment with my GP surgery. I was greeted by Dr. Robert Laurenson the BMA co chairman who went on holiday instead of manning a picket line. He now is working at our local surgery. I suppose it sums up the problem we have with a self appointed elite who feel they are above the 'common' folk. Did feudalism ever end?
Best wishes,
Michael"
Many thanks for the feedback Michael. I have long been meaning to respond to your last message about having no real voting choices. It's been a bit of a struggle to keep up correspendence, but now's the chance:
I do not find myself at all surprised to find that there are no real voting choices. For me part of the message of our times is that the systems and concepts of government we have had for a long time are no longer adequate. The more we are confronted with systemic failure, the more we are obliged to start moving toward different systems. In particular, it no longer makes sense to expect 'government' to be responsible for everything. We should be moving toward a day when government is responsible for defining and policing a frameworks of rights which empower other institutions to keep the commodities and the economy moving and others yet to operate cultural activities like education, science, medicine and the arts – both with no direct interference from government. (Other side being, no interference in government by corporations either).
Think of it as three mutually regulating 'governments' – one of the 'rights state', one of commerce, and one of culture (which encompasses everything else, and is particpated in by everybody else – or at least everybody who wants to). Except that each works differnently, and they are organised so as to be mutually regulating. 'Cultural' becomes a much wider category, including even things like banking and the operation of courts. Its institutions form freely and pluralistically and must be as free from government interference as possible. In a sense all of it is in service of 'culture' – because, surely, a flourishing culture is the goal? And because culture can only arise from the people. Despite ridiculous titles like 'minister of culture' it cannot be brought into being by government. But in another sense, it is still 'the state' that leads – the state remains the elected body and is the 'conductor of the orchestra', defining the rights framework that empowers all the rest. With it's remit thus reduced however, a) it might actually have a chance of succeeding, and b) people might stand a chance of understanding what they are voting for.
The political fight on 'existing terms' clearly has to go on, because for now that is the system we are in. But there we are back to square one – no meaningful options. Even if people are elected who might change things, they are generally prevented from doing so. Liz Truss was quickly removed, and a man installed who was not voted for even within the party. Such things reach right back to JFK – though we've at least made enough progress that nobody believes the 'lone madman' (Oswald) story any more. There is no authentic journalism - except in small pockets that the mainstream media calls 'fake news'. And as you say, the banks (and the ESG movement) are becoming Inquisitors.
For all these reasons we may be heading for dark times. What I am describing may seem an incredible reach. And it raises a lot of difficult questions about detail and practicality – which I'll work toward in future posts, as well as a forthcoming book. Certainly it can only be taken as a guiding principle for long incremental action. But what else are we to do? The old world does not work anymore.
Thank you, thank you, thank you Michael, for holding up the FULL reality of WHAT IS, not just the half that scares the daylights out of everyone and sends them reaching for distraction of any sort, just to normalize their blood pressure again. This kind of writing is exactly what we need: measured, honest, well-researched, clear. I feel informed reading it, but also empowered, which is exactly what I needed today. There are forces for good throughout, and it makes my heart sing to know more about them all. So well done, friend. Thank you. xox
uufff - it was so much work writing it. So glad it had that effect... everybody wants to spread awareness of what is going on, and then it becomes a littany of horrors. Important to try to balance that!
And balance it you did. Damn, I can only imagine the time it took to pull all those references together 😳