Something in Gestation...

society is responding to the dark challenges of the times

“IT AIN’T OVER”, I declared in the first of this series, referring to the big, multi-dimensional crisis that began in 2020. In the second part, I described the push for ‘parallel institutions’ which has organically begun in response to evidence that existing institutions are causing the problems, not fixing them. My original title, ‘The Elephant in the Womb’, was intended to suggest something, big, potent and positive that is in gestation in society, all over the world. As I said of it in Part One:

“Our elephant is being born into a hostile world precisely because that hostile world has called it forth. As is ever the case, the worse the horrors, and the worse the odds of overcoming them, the greater the courage and resolve which tends to manifest in the people.”

My (originally) two-part series was supposed to be complete at that point. But since then, two things have happened: One is that the horrors and threats to society that called forth the elephant have continued to demonstrate their tremendous and orchestrated power, and their ongoing resolve. The other is that ‘the elephants’ are multiplying. Let’s take them in turn:

The hunger of the powers for ‘government by media’ intensifies, and the plans to reinforce it with combination of social credit scoring and central bank digital currencies is being vigourously progressed. So is the attempt to continue the weaponisation of ‘public health’ by removing all national-decision making in future pandemics and handing it to the W.H.O., which got everything so spectacularly wrong (at least from a public health point of view) over the past three years.

A tiny handful of investment funds with political aspirations still own and control most of the world, and ‘revolving door syndrome’ is still widespread.

Reports emerge that Western intelligence agencies prepared the way, ahead of time, for the illiberal policies foisted on the world in 2020, and also ‘dis-informed’ governments in the process.¹

We become aware that the world’s biggest consulting firms are active collaborators in WEF’s ‘Great Reset’ plans, and all of them made hundreds of millions of dollars/pounds/euros out of pandemic-related activities, often from within government.²

Politicians who are a threat to the globalist machine continue to be persecuted, smeared, cancelled and kept out of power in any way possible. And this recognises no party-preferences: A candidate like Robert F. Kennedy steps forward for the American Democrats, with promises to ban pharmaceutical companies from advertising, issue pardons for Assange and Snowden, stop media censorship, etc, etc, and he is defamed, vilified and denied ‘mainstream’ airtime to a level perhaps even worse than was the last big disruptor, from the other side of the political fence. (We all know his name).

Resonating with the way that the Canadian government last year denied protestors access to their bank accounts, banks in the UK have now been closing the accounts of people whose political views they don’t like. Shocking, but true.³

Farms are still being seized in Holland. French police have just turned surveillance drones on their dissenting public. ‘Excess deaths’ still remain alarmingly high around the world, and governments and the media still refuse to talk about it.

‘Fact-checking’ organisations, whose real role is to suppress or discredit facts that conflict with certain political agendas, continue to sprout like weeds. One of the latest is BBC Verify, quickly nick-named ‘BBC Vilify’, for the tactics ‘fact-checkers’ most often use to smear those whose views they don’t like.

---

---

NEW AND INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS:

So what of ‘the elephants’? Well, after I highlighted, in parts ONE and TWO, numerous high profile U-turns on ‘the narrative’, legal actions against governments and pharmaceutical companies, exposures of criminality and malfeasance and, perhaps most importantly, emerging ‘parallel institutions’, I kept seeing more of the same emerging, until I felt moved to record them as ‘part three’.

So here are some more since last time I wrote. Some of them are new and have arisen directly in response to the increasingly serious threats to civilisation over the past three years. Others were ahead of the game - organisations which have recently raised their profile in response to the extremity of the times, but which were actually established in the years before ‘covid’.

Big Brother Watch (UK) was set up in 2009, and has had good reason to intensify its activities more recently. The Free Speech Union (UK) was set up in 2020. In addition to campaigning, it provides active support to those victimised for their opinions whether in the workplace, university or being ‘no platformed’ in the broadcasting world, makes grants to individuals and organisations committed to free speech, and organises public ‘speakeasy’ events. One Small Town (UK)is a tremendously practical initiative which is organising localised and people-led production efforts on a town by town basis - and doing it successfully enough to attract investors.⁴ In the course of 2023 two more independent / cultural organisations have arisen in the USA: We The Patriots’, a non-profit organisation defending medical and educational freedom, parental rights, free speech and food safety, and the National American Renaissance Movement, which looks especially substantial and well-organised, and devotes itself to driving forward criminal investigations into covid-related crimes, and pitting 'the Great Reset' against 'the Great Awakening'. I’ll also mention in passing The Attack on Food and Agriculture Symposium, leading the fight on that issue, and The Northern Light Convention, set up in May of this year by Mads Palsvig, a former investment banker who has long been fighting to expose the dark nature of the international banking system (and who has very predictably - though rather ridiculously - been smeared as a ‘fascist’ for doing so). The event, held in Sweden, brought together many of the heroes of the past three years, including Professor Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Meryl Nass, as well as some of the gutsier of our politicians, such as Robert F. Kennedy Junior, and Euro-MP Christine Anderson.

Put them all together with HARE, The ARC, The Public Banking Institute and all the others from Part Two. Draw upon their resources. Support them by spreading the word, or with donations or participation.

DILLIGENT DOCTORS:

At a more individual level, diligent doctors, devoted to humanity in time-honoured spirit of the profession, are also making wonderful progress in getting to better understanding of what has happened and how damage can be mitigated or reversed. Three doctors in particular have made valuable progress with treating vaccine-related harms:

Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD

has developed a procedure using EDTA chelation plus vitamin C which appears to reverse pathological clumping of blood cells post-vaccine.

Peter McCullough, MD

has published research on the use of bromelain and curcumin to alleviate problems stemming from repeated exposure to the spike-protein, irrespective whether from virus or vaccine. And

Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

has developed a protocol for treating both vaccine injuries and spike-protein poisoning. Notably, his protocol is based on the drug Ivermectin, the long 'establishment' campaign against which – waged because Ivermectin was threatening vaccine profits - is now thoroughly proven to have been unfounded.

FIGHTING BACK:

The emergence of new, people-led institutions however, is only one dimension of a much broader fight-back. New legal actions against ‘pandemic miscreants’,⁵ some striking court decisions coming down in favour of ‘the Elephants’,⁶ and the stream of informative publications, documentaries and generally inspiring messages goes on.⁷ Ordinary citizens continue to scoring wins too. Canadian citizens raised two million dollars in a few weeks in support of the nation’s truckers contesting Trudeau (until the latter seized the bank accounts of both the protestors and those who had offered them financial support, but more on that below). In the UK, wins are opening up in the fight-back against the imposition of ‘15-minute cities’. Beyond their innocent-sounding name (and slick, expensive and relentless P.R.) these look in reality like they are intended to become permanent restrictions on freedom of movement – in much the same way that 'two weeks to flatten the curve' became years of unreasonable and ill-founded restrictions ,and led into still-ongoing discussions of the possibility of 'climate lockdowns'. In Thetford, Norfolk, protestors at one council meeting were elected to the council weeks later, and are now taking the fight up to the County Council level and pressing, with some early signs of success, for commitment not to proceed with plans for cameras, road closures, systems of fines etc. ⁸

At the end of July, public backlash against closing the accounts of ‘those with unfavourable political views’ claimed the scalps of two UK banking CEO’s.⁹ It also led to the setting up and rapid growth of ‘accountclosed.org’ as means for measuring the size of the problem and providing support to its victims. The scale of public concern about the issue has been elevated to the point that there are even promises from the government of new legislation to curb such actions. (We’ll have to wait and see what the promises may bring).

The global plan to eradicate cash (happening entirely outside of democratic process, and dovetailing with those for vaccine passports, digital ids, social credit scoring et al), is also subject to some significant and visible push-back.¹⁰

Also encouraging is the level of action on ‘the WHO power-grab’. The W.H.O., now known to be working for commercial interests,¹¹ has been progressing toward a treaty which would allow it to supersede all nation-level decision-making in future pandemics. But awareness-raising on this disturbing move toward commercially-controlled world government, and political action to stop it, has intensified greatly.

Researcher and author James Roguski sets out how the process will proceed toward its December 2023 deadline.¹² (Useful for any who wish to know what is going on, and maybe engage with their political representative on it).

Doortofreedom.org is an extended group of doctors and lawyers who recently got together to raise awareness of the issue and to prevent it

In the UK, politicians such as Esther McVey¹³ and Andrew Bridgen ¹⁴work hard to prevent the treaty from being slipped in by the back door. Doctor John Campbell¹⁵ is spreading awareness of it to his millions of viewers worldwide. In the USA, the Sovereignty Coalition, founded by a group of politicians as well as high-profile medical scientists like Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of mRNA technologies) are campaigning for the USA to ‘exit the WHO’. In the European Union, citizens from Poland, Belgium, Austria, Germany, Czech Republic, Portugal and Bulgaria, backed by 5 MEP’s, have launched a European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) called "Trust & Freedom", similarly aimed at preventing such a ‘back door takeover’. German MEP Christine Anderson bravely set out their case before the European Parliament in July of 2023. Here are some extracts from her powerful speech:

“Because an unelected body like WHO, (which) is controlled and run by multi-billionaires, should never be allowed to act in place of democratically elected government…. They will be exposed, each and every one of them, by name…. We are here to tell you, globalitarian misanthropists… we are millions around the world - it is you that are the small fringe minority… So take it from me, take it from us, take from these seven citizens, take it from the millions and millions of people around the world, WE WILL BRING YOU DOWN”.

Elsewhere, the real effect those millions of awakening citizens can have are already visible: A retrospective view¹⁶ suggests that despite being made invisible to most of the world, and despite the unconscionable response it met from government, the Canadian trucker’s 'Freedom Convoy' of 2022 was immensely successful - to a degree, in fact, that is terrifying to the web of would-be autocrats around the world.

It may be true that when both the truckers and their supporters had their bank accounts frozen, the protest broke up. But while the media and the regime wanted people to come away with the feeling that 'resistance to the NWO plans is futile', the reality was that the government, rightly mindful of the scale of discontent still arrayed against them, in fact caved in on all the big issues: Jason Kenny, the pro-lockdown premier of Alberta resigned, and all lockdowns in the state were lifted. Pro-lockdown leader of the national conservative party Erin O'Toole was forced to resign, ultimately being replaced by Pierre Polievre, who had supported the truckers. The emergency powers act Trudeau shamelessly used to deny dissenting citizens access to their money was intended for time of war. Trudeau sought to extend those powers – even though the protest had ended – and failed. Apparently nervous of what a rightly-disgruntled public might do in the coming warmer weather – given that in the depth of Canadian winter they had set up the logistics for thousands of trucks to converge on Ottawa via 3000 miles of treacherous northern roads, supported by millions of people who crowd-funded them with millions of dollars (sequestered at one point in the proceedings), and greeted them at the roadside along the way, standing out in minus 40 to give them coffee, food and support – the authorities began a quite roll-back of all restrictions.

In a short space of time, lockdown policies across the country had been reversed, and measures against the unvaccinated had been dropped. Trudeau had almost been forced out by his own party, and the government had been humiliated and had lost authority, which it never recovered. As the author of the 'retrospective' which I refer to put it:

“it might just have been the most successful individual protest in human history. The most successful violent revolutions have not achieved such total reversals in culture and policy across so many levels of government, in such few short months”.¹⁷

The reason that powerful elites still want the 'trucker's protest' seen as a failure is the same reason that they were so deeply agitated by Brexit, the French 'Yellow Vests', and the Dutch Farmers protest: The possibility that the suburban and rural middle-class, the small business owners, and the honest workers will realize the power they have in coordination, logistics, and initiative.

THE SHIFTING GLOBAL BALANCE:

When they are numerous enough, and persistent enough, people-powered initiatives can and do change the world. But they always do so in some kind of interaction with higher-level geopolitics. So what is the picture looking like there? Well, it should of course be kept at the forefront of the mind that what is happening is above all a spiritual battle - that everything that happens in this earthly battle is the reflection of a battle in the heavens. And also that it is a very long term process of which we are presently watching only cameos, even if significant ones. Nonetheless, an informed contemporary analysis on the geopolitical 'state of play' is relevant. That said, since last I wrote of ‘who is winning the battle for the soul of the world’ in Part Two - with a somewhat historical perspective - a more contemporary, as well as somewhat optimistic, perspective¹⁸ has come forth from trends analyst

Alex Krainer

The summary of it goes something like this:

Soon into the ‘covid crisis’, it became obvious that some kind global agenda was being driven by the international banking cartel. As 2020 progressed, massive inconsistencies in ‘the narrative’ began to sound alarm bells for many people. Krainer at the time said that '“the powers-that-be would need something pretty damned impressive to distract us away”, and that would likely be a war.

Having successfully pushed Ukraine and Russia into war, ‘the establishment’ found that their hope for it to become an all-out assault on Russia by a ‘united West’ didn’t happen.

All kinds of other bizarre social and political ‘issues’ that have been manufactured as distractions were and are failing to gain traction with the public.

The much-vaunted ‘Rules Based Order’ is losing power as it becomes plain that what it means is ‘Our rules, not your rules, do as we say, or else’. (Economic sanctions, rising through military invasions and coups, to political assassinations).

This, combined with America’s ousting from Afghanistan and its failure in its bid to crush Russia, has emboldened other countries to recognise that they are no longer under the yoke of American hegemony which bound them since the end of World War Two, and to start acting more independently. Thus the principle of the Multi-Polar World is rising.

Furthermore, it is becoming apparent that the ‘NWO alliance’ has not in fact been based on common values, but on coercion, and now that things are not going well a kind of civil war is developing internally between the ruling elites of Western countries.

(Krainer cites especially long historical discordance between France’s vision of the world and that of other Western powers, culminating in a France under Macron in 2023 which, while it is certainly committed to a vision of world-technocracy, is increasingly breaking ranks with other NWO countries on strategy and policy directions. And the huge and ongoing rebellion of the French people against their NWO government intensifies that).

Bottom line: Those who seek to impose global, ideological, technological control are finding themselves in difficulty.

Another somewhat optimistic message (at least for those who are not supporters of the New World Order) has come from retired U.S. Colonel Douglas MacGregor. MacGregor suggests that a majority of the world's 137 countries are 'sick to death' of the United States, above all for its use of financial systems to bully and coerce. Some of those countries (most especially China, India and Russia) have been working hard to accumulate large amounts of gold, with the specific objective getting out from under the bully-power of the fiat dollar. He suggests that in the coming years some of those countries will peg their currencies to gold, or launch a new gold-backed currency (there are signs that the BRICS nations may collectively do that imminently), and free themselves from the US-led New World Order. The bottom line in McGregor's view is that the powers which are currently setting the agenda are losing their grip and:

“Over the next few years we are going to see all the politicians that are in charge in the West swept away. That includes our own. [U.S.] Everything is going to be swept away and people are going to start over”. ¹⁹

There is no certainty that MacGregor is correct in this, but let's at least say that he is in no way naive about the extent of financial control which is powering the agendas that are at work, nor a stranger to geo-political analysis. His view-point is worth considering.

REALISM AND PERSISTENCE:

I do not mean to imply by any of what has been presented in this series of articles that I believe the battle is nearly won. Not at all. I acknowledged right at the beginning the entrenched power of those who control all the money, and have infiltrated a great many of the institutions. The disengagement and mal-engagement of vast number of ordinary people remains a great hurdle. And there’s no shortage of commentators who tell us – and one can hardly suggest that their views are groundless - that they believe the battle is already lost and that the descent into totalitarianism is now unavoidable. What I do mean to say is that there are quite definitely two sides to the battle. The number of people who are awakening, while it does not approach any kind of majority, is nonetheless genuinely unprecedented. And, as testified above, they are having an impact. As to those who suggest the battle is already lost, to them I simply say that ‘making predictions is very difficult, especially when it is for the future'.

Let’s take our victories where we can.

Keep going dear Elephant.

1. See Michael Senger ‘Was the Covid Response a Coup by the Intelligence Community?’ published by the Brownstone Institute.

2. See

Ben Rubin

‘Klaus Schwab’s Willing Executioners’.

3. In 2022, Paypal shut down the account of the UK-based 'Free Speech Union'. By 2023 the number of banks closing accounts because of political opinions was rising fast, particularly in the UK. An especially high-profile case was politician / tv presenter Nigel Farage in the summer of 2023. When Coutts Bank closed his account, he sought to open a new one but was declined by seven other banks. But there were hundreds of other cases, from a UK-based descendent of Leo Tolstoy, to a British vicar. Alexandra Tolstoy, a single mother and small business owner, was 'debanked' essentially for being Russian, and the Reverend Richard Fotheringay had his accounts closed after sharing his views on 'gender transitioning' on social media.

4. ‘One Small Town’ founder Michael Tellinger says that its core principle of 3 hours of voluntary work per volunteer per week can, in a town of 10,000 people, generate more labour than a big corporate business can afford to buy – meaning that they really cannot compete such initiatives out of existence. The operation has its own currency tokens, and currently produces food and clothing and other commodities as well as selling art internationally. Participants enjoy in varying degree both the products and the profits. One Small Town is profitable enough to now be attracting investors, though investors can only own a maximum of 30% of any enterprise, with the rest always being owned by the participants. It was set up in 2005 and is growing in scale and success. See interview here.

5. In addition to the long list of legal actions in progress that were listed in the original 'The Elephant in the Womb' piece, various others have come to attention during the summer:

• In mid-August, the recently-formed 'National American Renaissance Movement' submitted an 83 page grand jury petition to the Idaho Attorney General. Supported by a number of lawyers and medical doctors, it named 65 defendants in covid-related criminality and negligence. Subsequently similar actions have been filed (by the same body) to the Attornys General of Florida, New Jersey and Texas.

• A group of doctors, including the president of the Vaccine Safety Research Council, has lodged a formal complaint against the U.S. Department of Education regarding its failure to conduct proper pandemic reviews of the Council on Education of Public Health ("CEPH"), which accredits 'public health schools'. The filing requested a public hearing and denial of the renewal application for accreditation authority of CEPH because its failure to properly enforce public health education standards has led to acceptance of bonuses, bribes, grants, and employment, and as a result, has caused death and injury to patients. (See 'Complaint Filed Against Department of Education Concerning Public Health Education and Promotion of COVID-19 Vaccines', Dr. Peter McCullough, Substack.

• In Scotland former first minister Nicola Sturgeon is being investigated by police with regard to 5,500 care home deaths.

• In the U.S.A. Congressman Rand Paul has referred Anthony Fauci to the Department of Justice for Criminal Investigation for perjury in pandemic-related matters.

• At the end of August, 4 doctors in Washington State began a legal action to the sue the state Medical Commission for violating their constitutional right to free speech.

• Similarly, and in the same month, Dr. Meryl Nass sued the medical board in Maine, also for violating her right to free speech.

• Australian medic Dr. Julian Fidge is suing Pfizer and Moderna over unapproved GMOs in mRNA Covid vaccines.

6. A number of court rulings, as well as new pieces of legislation, that have gone against ‘the authoritarians’:

• In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that universities must cease the practice of making race a factor in deciding admissions.

• In July, federal judge Terry Doughty issued an injunction barring numerous federal officials and agencies from having any contact with social media firms for the purpose of discouraging or removing First Amendment-protected speech. (Subsequently the 5^th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court that the government had acted illegally in this matter. At the time of writing the Supreme Court has suspended the judgement for a couple of weeks while it decides whether to hear the case itself.

• And a military tribunal in Canada has ruled that vaccine mandates for service personnel had violated the rights of those members who refused vaccination and declared the policy to have been overly broad and in places arbitrary.

• On September 1, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s ruling that “sovereign immunity” protects the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from any wrongdoing or harm in the Apter et al case. (A case in which doctors were taking action against government interference in their medical practice).

• In late August, a federal court ruled that since it is not a doctor, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) overstepped its authority by warning people not to take Ivermectin and re-instated the case of three doctors against that agency.

• In August, Collier County, Florida passed legislation in response to “growing concerns over the federal government’s increasing encroachment on the rights and privileges of its citizens”. Known as the “Bill of Rights Sanctuary County Ordinance”, it asserts that Collier County “has the right to be free from the commanding hand of the federal government and has the right to refuse to cooperate with federal government officials in response to unconstitutional federal government measures, and to proclaim a Bill of Rights Sanctuary for law-abiding citizens in its cities and County”.

• 10 counties in Florida have adopted a 'ban the jab' resolution.

• The governor of Iowa has come out strongly against more lockdowns and mandates going into autumn of 2023.

• Vaccine mandates have been rescinded for all U.S. Military Personnel.

7. I especially love this message from

Celia Farber

about how black humour keeps the world strong, how laughing at tyrants is the best strategy, and how endless creativity and humour makes society indestructible. Other messages from ‘the cultural’ include the stunning documentary ‘Battleground Melbourne’ by one of Australia’s most recognised Libertarian Political Commentator and Human Rights activists Topher Field - Winner of the Australian Libertarian of the Year award in 2016 and 2022. Unmissable. And to the long list of inspiring books in the footnotes of Part Two, are here added:

‘180 Degrees: Unlearn The Lies You've Been Taught To Believe’ by Fergus O’Connor Greenwood.

‘The New Abnormal - The Rise of the Biomedical Security State’ by psychiatrist

Aaron Kheriaty, MD

‘Facing the Beast: Courage, Faith, and Resistance in a New Dark Age’ by

Dr Naomi Wolf

8. See Richard Vobes’ interview with newly elected Thetford town councillor, Kris Brooks.

9. Alison Rose, CEO of NatWest and Peter Flavel, Ceo of Coutts.

10. Britain’s rising TV news show ‘GB News’ has instigated a ‘Don’t Kill Cash' campaign. Bolstered by the public outcry over politically-motivated account closures, signatures in support of this campaign have very quickly risen to a quarter of a million, and have begun to win, even if for narrow political motives, support from parties across the political spectrum. Another separate initiative, 'cashisfreedom.uk', has mounted a campaign for awareness of the dangers of CBDCs. It has put flyers in the shape of bank notes on the counters of pubs and other institutions around the country, and a paid for a vast billboard seen by millions. In Austria meanwhile, a politician is moving to 'enshrine cash in the constitution' – which Reuters news-agency quickly, and bizarrely, denounced as inherently being an “extreme-right idea” (See ‘Austrian Leader Backs Far-Right Idea of Enshrining Cash in Constitution’, Reuters, August 4, 2023. A number of countries, including Denmark and Ecuador have announced that they won’t proceed with digital currencies.

11. The World Health Organisation receives 18% of its financial contributions directly from nation states. This amount it is free to use as it wishes. 80% of its revenue comes from voluntary contributions for various international institutions, under condition that those institutions direct how it is used, and for which W.H.O. programs it may and may not be used. Various pharmaceutical companies contribute around 100,000 dollars per year. George Soros' Open Foundation a quarter of a million per year. The Clinton 'Health Access Initiative' half a million per year. The Rockefeller Foundation 2 million per year. The World Bank 50 million per year. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 300 million per year. And the GAVI Vaccine Alliance (funded partly by organisations like the Wellcome Trust and, once again the Gates Foundation, 200 million per year. These are the organisations which call the shots on all of the W.H.O.'s activities. See 'How Deep Does the Rot Go?' on Dr. Tess Lawrie's Substack, in which her guest, micro-biologist Fahrie Hasaan summarises his research data on funding.

12. See ‘Tess Talks with James Roguski’ and ‘James Roguski, W.H.O. timeline of events’.

13. Esther McVey here.

14. Andrew Bridgen here.

15. Dr. John Campbell here.

16. See

Kulak

‘The Truckers Won’. Everything.

17. See

Kulak

‘The Truckers Won. Everything’.

18. See ‘Alex Krainer on the emerging world disruption of the old world order’, an interview with journalist Vanesa Beeley.

19. See Colonel Douglas McGregor interview with Jeremy Ryan Slate, August 2023.